Very intuitive tool Pros: The possibility to work in multiple ways, both by writing software code and not. Cons: Maybe some integrations are missing at the moment, but the team is working on implementing them.

An innovative tool Overall: different from all the other test automation ones, very easy to use and to maintain (there’s no need of GUI Maps, Test Object repositories and so on). You just need to focus on writing the test (we used the coded version) and Maveryx will do all the r est Pros: Maveryx’s main advantage is that it helps you and your team save a lot of time, that can be used in other ways such as increasing test coverage or ensuring the quality of the web and desktop application under test. Moreover, as Maveryx automatically recognize UI changes in the application, maintenance effort is minimum. Cons: We do believe that, in order to use Maveryx at its best, a basic knowledge of Java is needed. In fact, even though it is possible to use the codeless version, it won’t allow you to exploit all of Maveryx’s features and functionalities.

Great tool Overall: I had to implement automatic JAVA GUI testing quickly without spending too much time acquiring knownledge in any language/tool. Maveryx totally fullfiled this assumption. Pros: This product is very simple to install, configure and use. It gives very good results in terms of results (not toom much false alarms). Cons: Unfortunatelly, Maveryx was not compatible with all JAVA GUI.

Innovative, effective and efficient Overall: Having done test automation for almost 20 years, I learned, from painful experience, that the most important feature of good automation is its maintainability. One of the most important steps toward it, is to make sure that any object accessed, or otherwise needed, can be found efficiently and consistently independently from possible changes. When I stopped at Maveryx at a testing conference, I was intrigued by their claim to have solved this problem but was rather sceptical. I had so many questions and, in the end, they gave me the product to test on my own. Yes, it works (unless your developers are not only clever but evil!) and I have also come to believe that they really understand the importance of maintainability: their product is not only about getting automation out fast, it also considers its maintainability. Pros: Thanks to its runtime GUI objects recognition feature, it is possible to reduce the automation development time while improving maintainability Cons: You need time to get used to the new way of thinking

Test (is really) simple! Overall: The challenge for Dedalus was to find a tool that could be used quickly and efficiently by the functional users (no tech guys involved) and also a tool that provides a robust framework for the testing of new features. With Maveryx we achieved these goals. Pros: - The "Keywords" approach. Thanks to this feature the tests can be written by functional users instead of tech users. - The extensibility. We created some custom keywords and methods to speed up the on-boarding of different teams according to the different needs. - The Integrations. Very easy to integrate with our CI (Jira & Jenkins). - The Support. A team with real experience and expertise, which supports companies during the preliminary analysis, design and execution. Always available. Cons: - Converting tool missing. If there was one functionality that starting from a registered video, it creates the skeleton for the keywords file, this could have increased the adoption in all of the company.

A very good product with ample room for improvement Pros: As far as the product itself is concerned, I will refer only to the method of instrumentation via excel sheet and for websites. One of the strengths is certainly the way in which objects are searched within the DOM, without having to specify how to search. If I'm not mistaken, the headless mode was in the works at the time, so even such a solution would be integrated within any CI/CD pipeline. One word for the support, they have been absolutely competent, available and punctual, as well as the people who assisted us during the POC. Cons: In our opinion, the solution has ample room for improvement, starting perhaps from an excel sheet template in which objects such as actions are "guided" and selectable perhaps by dropdown. This would avoid (at least in part) both making mistakes and having to consult the manual; moreover, it would be useful perhaps to specify the scope of the testing (site, java application, etc ..) in order to filter the objects to be shown.

Great for automate your GUI testing Overall: The experience was great, very powerful test automation tool, used to speed up new people in test automation in very little time. Pros: What I like most of Maveryx is mainly the ease of use and the ability to integrate it with our CI pipeline Cons: I would love it if it could support more languages for writing test cases, but what they have is more than enough.